📊 FASB ASU 2023-08 Compliance Guide

Fair Market Value
Accounting for Crypto

The definitive guide to implementing ASU 2023-08 fair value measurement. Master FMV requirements before the December 2024 deadline for public companies.

Dec 2024 Public Company Deadline
Dec 2025 Private Company Deadline
Level 1-3 Fair Value Hierarchy
The Challenge

Why Historical Cost Accounting Failed Crypto

Before ASU 2023-08, crypto was treated as an indefinite-lived intangible asset-creating accounting that didn't reflect economic reality.

Historical Cost (ASC 350)

Outdated
  • Write-downs only (impairment)
  • No recovery when prices rise
  • Asymmetric P&L impact
  • Doesn't reflect true holdings value

Example: Buy 1 BTC @ $30,000

Price → $45K Still $30K on books
Price → $25K Impaired to $25K
Price → $35K Stuck at $25K forever

Fair Value (ASU 2023-08)

Required
  • Mark-to-market each period
  • Gains & losses in income
  • Symmetric P&L treatment
  • True economic representation

Example: Buy 1 BTC @ $30,000

Price → $45K +$15K gain recognized
Price → $25K -$20K loss recognized
Price → $35K +$10K gain recognized
ASC 820 Definition

What is Fair Market Value?

"The price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." - ASC 820 (Fair Value Measurement)

Exit Price

What you'd receive selling-not what you'd pay buying

Orderly Transaction

Not a forced or distressed liquidation

Market Participants

Hypothetical buyers, not specific counterparties

Measurement Date

Specific reporting date (e.g., quarter-end)

ASC 820 Framework

The Fair Value Hierarchy

ASC 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value inputs. Most crypto assets qualify for Level 1.

Level 1

Quoted Prices in Active Markets

Most reliable. Use quoted prices for identical assets in active markets.

BTC on Coinbase ETH on Binance SOL on Kraken
Active Market Requirements:
  • Sufficient frequency and volume
  • Pricing information publicly available
  • Transactions between market participants
Preferred
Level 2

Observable Inputs

Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset.

Less liquid exchanges Similar asset prices Adjusted quotes
Acceptable
Level 3

Unobservable Inputs

Internal models and assumptions. Requires significant disclosure and documentation.

Newly issued tokens Illiquid positions Custom valuations
Use with Caution
Scope

Which Crypto Assets Qualify?

ASU 2023-08 applies to crypto assets meeting all five criteria.

Required Criteria

1

Intangible Asset

Meets ASC 350 intangible asset definition

2

No Contractual Rights

Doesn't provide rights to goods, services, or underlying assets

3

Distributed Ledger

Created or resides on blockchain or similar technology

4

Cryptographically Secured

Uses cryptography for creation and ownership verification

5

Fungible

Each unit is interchangeable with any other unit

Qualifying Assets

Bitcoin (BTC) Ethereum (ETH) Solana (SOL) Layer 1 Tokens Most Utility Tokens

Excluded Assets

NFTs Not fungible
Wrapped Tokens Contractual claim to underlying
Stablecoins* May have reserve claims
Security Tokens Represent equity/debt

*Stablecoin treatment is nuanced-analyze each token's legal structure.

Roadmap

Implementation Checklist

Five steps to compliant FMV accounting.

1

Inventory Holdings

  • Identify all crypto assets
  • Classify each as qualifying or non-qualifying
  • Document classification rationale
2

Establish Pricing Methodology

  • Select price sources (exchanges, data providers)
  • Define VWAP or principal market approach
  • Set measurement time conventions (e.g., 23:59 UTC)
  • Document in accounting policy memo
3

Configure Systems

  • Set up fair value capture at period-end
  • Establish review and approval workflows
  • Run parallel tests before go-live
4

Prepare Disclosures

  • Fair value hierarchy level per asset
  • Valuation techniques and inputs
  • Transfers between levels
  • Level 3 reconciliation (if applicable)
5

Train & Document

  • Accounting staff on new requirements
  • Audit committee briefing
  • Control documentation for SOX/SOC
Methodology

Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP)

For most crypto assets, VWAP across major exchanges provides the most defensible fair value measurement.

VWAP = Σ(Price × Volume) / Σ(Volume)

Weights prices by actual trading activity, reducing manipulation risk from thin-volume venues.

🎯

Audit-Defensible

Objective methodology with clear documentation trail

🛡️

Manipulation-Resistant

Volume-weighting filters out anomalous prices

📊

Comprehensive

Aggregates data from multiple major exchanges

Example: BTC VWAP Calculation

Exchange Price Volume Weighted
Coinbase $67,250 2,400 BTC $161.4M
Binance $67,180 5,100 BTC $342.6M
Kraken $67,300 1,200 BTC $80.8M
VWAP $67,211.49 8,700 BTC $584.8M
Compliance

What Auditors Need

Build audit-ready documentation from day one.

Transaction History

Complete records of all buys, sells, transfers, and DeFi interactions with timestamps.

Pricing Documentation

Source data, methodology memos, and evidence of prices used at each measurement date.

Classification Support

Analysis showing why each asset qualifies or doesn't qualify under ASU 2023-08 criteria.

Internal Controls

Evidence of review, approval workflows, and segregation of duties for valuation process.

Methodology Policies

Documented accounting policies for valuation approach, timing, and hierarchy classification.

Disclosure Drafts

Fair value footnotes, hierarchy tables, and Level 3 reconciliations ready for financial statements.

Ready to Implement FMV Accounting?

Coincile's Pricing Engine delivers institutional-grade fair value measurements with complete audit trails-built for ASU 2023-08 compliance.

  • Multi-source VWAP aggregation
  • Point-in-time historical prices
  • Full audit trail documentation
  • API access for automation